Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Autumn's First Sunrise...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Epping, NH
    Posts
    657
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 58 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill O
    I guess I haven't seen too many HDR shots. The ones I have seen do have an un-natural look. But, just for arguments sake. Isn't HDR much more realistic in terms of what the human eye can see? What's the range of light that the human eye can see as compared to a digital camera or B&W film?
    That IS the goal, I just don't think that 1) the software is there yet and 2) Users go overboard with it...

    Examples: http://www.flickr.com/groups/hdr
    A few work here, most look gaudy, overdone, and unnatural...
    "I've learned that everyone wants to live on top of the mountain, but that all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it."
    ~Andy Rooney

    Follow my photography on Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jim-Sa...y/156147782386

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    542
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JimS
    Mike, A straight Neutral density filter, one without graduation, will just slow the camera down, and make it work harder for the right exposure. They do sell round, screw on GND filters, that might work...or new high quality cameras could work as well!
    Jim, I don't know anything about filters, but John Mitchell (to others, John Mitchell is a retired professional photographer on staff) is the one who advised me on the purchase (btw, it was a screw on filter).

    New cameras it is.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    542
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default To PhotoShop or not to do that...

    I prefer Picasa's "I'm feeling Lucky"

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Epping, NH
    Posts
    657
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 58 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike D
    Jim, I don't know anything about filters, but John Mitchell (to others, John Mitchell is a retired professional photographer on staff) is the one who advised me on the purchase (btw, it was a screw on filter).

    New cameras it is.
    To clarify my point, a ND filter does cut the light reaching the sensor, so it is true that it will save the ccd. John is right. However, without adjusting the aperature or 'speed' settings, the camera just works overtime to get the origional light that it desires for a proper exposure. John is right in his thinking to save the sensor though...

    My real point though is that a round graduated filter will result in a better overall exposure while saving the ccd.
    Last edited by JimS; 09-25-2007 at 10:56 AM.
    "I've learned that everyone wants to live on top of the mountain, but that all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it."
    ~Andy Rooney

    Follow my photography on Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jim-Sa...y/156147782386

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Colorado, for now
    Posts
    468
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill O
    I just installed Photoshop CS 2 on my old laptop and was wondering what kind of memory does it take to run the HDR process?

    There's nothing wrong with photoshopping. If Ansel Adams had Photoshop, he would have used it. They did it all the time back in the dark room through burning, dodging, and many other physical touch-ups.
    I am not entirely sure, but on mine, with 2 gig, I have no trouble. As with most in photoshop, the more the merrier. Usually with lower memory you can just bump up the scratch disk and use the hard drive as virtual memory. This does affect the speed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •