Thanks for the clarification. Makes us accuracy snobs feel much better.
Thanks for the clarification. Makes us accuracy snobs feel much better.
Perhaps you should calibrate yourself to spell correctly. Darn science teachers.Originally Posted by JimS
![]()
Brian Clark
MWO Observer and Meteorologist
http://mountwashington.accuweather.com<---- My blog on AccuWeather.com
We are....PENN STATE!!
No problem Bill....glad that made sense.Originally Posted by Bill O
Brian Clark
MWO Observer and Meteorologist
http://mountwashington.accuweather.com<---- My blog on AccuWeather.com
We are....PENN STATE!!
Me fail english, tha'ts unpossible!Originally Posted by bclark
"I've learned that everyone wants to live on top of the mountain, but that all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it."
~Andy Rooney
Follow my photography on Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jim-Sa...y/156147782386
Equations by definition work both ways. You should be able to use the measured wind speed from the Setra, resolve the equations back to to a differential pressure in inches of water, and then recalculate for temp/pressure errors. The setra actually works more or less identically to everything else, an inch of water is an inch of water, regardless of the device. Thus the same equation that you use for the Barton applies to the setra.Originally Posted by bclark
I'll try to take a look at it this evening if I get a chance.
Use the setra. It is far more sensitive than the Barton. Also was the needle on the Barton changed prior to the storm? if not it was probably dried up, and had a lot of frictional drag, hence the lower speed. As a note: the setra and barton agreed extremely well for the 158 mph event back in October of 06.
Lastly, the corrections are typically only applied for record setting gusts... not just any big wind.
-Neil
If you can only spell things one way you are lacking in creativity.Originally Posted by bclark
Brad (a 6288 club member)
http://bradstreet.zenfolio.com Personal Photo sales site
http://public.fotki.com/bradbradstreet Personal photo web site
http://public.fotki.com/MWO/saved/2012/ MWO image & video archive site 2006-2012
Ok, so I have learned a lot over the last couple days in dealing with correcting this wind gust for temperature and pressure. Neil is right, the Setra is a much better device to use to determine the corrected wind speed. I used the equation we use to turn the differential pressure measurement from the Setra into a wind speed, and solved for the differential pressure created during the 148.5 wind gust that the Setra measured assuming a standard temperature and pressure. This gave a measurement of 9.13 inches of displaced water column.Originally Posted by Neil
Then, I recalculated the corrected wind speed using this differential pressure instead of the one from the Barton chart. This gave me a corrected wind gust of 144.6 mph. This is only a 2.6% correction from the 148.5 gust originally measured
This is going to be the final and official corrected wind gust for this event...and I'm serious this time.![]()
So, that changes the winner of the contest yet again. Sorry WSR88D, it is actually KD who is the winner with a guess of 144.
Brian Clark
MWO Observer and Meteorologist
http://mountwashington.accuweather.com<---- My blog on AccuWeather.com
We are....PENN STATE!!
Yah, eye noo dat!Me go sweep floor and empty trash now. Yoo beeg 4-head guys need NE mor cal-q-lay-shuns, u lemme no.
KDT
home:http://ghostflowers.com/
Mount Washington:http://ghostflowers.com/nhscenics/mountwashington.html
Can I have your order graph?Originally Posted by KD Talbot
Brad (a 6288 club member)
http://bradstreet.zenfolio.com Personal Photo sales site
http://public.fotki.com/bradbradstreet Personal photo web site
http://public.fotki.com/MWO/saved/2012/ MWO image & video archive site 2006-2012