Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 231

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas, currently. Moving back north to New England as soon as possible.
    Posts
    82
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default 231

    So the record is 231 mph, set in 1937. That's a long time ago. It makes me wonder two things. First, has that ever been reached since, or nearly reached. Second, I am wondering how accurate that measurement was with the instruments of the time, considering whether (lol weather) that velocity has been nearly achieved since, or not... If wind speeds have not encroached on 231... say 225, with modern methods of measurement, then we have to wonder if the speed was truly 231 mph...... Not to burst anyones bubble, just wondering about that.
    Only one way to go.. Up!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Epping, NH
    Posts
    658
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 58 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    There's a lot of information about the record floating around on this site:
    http://www.mountwashington.org/about...recordwind.php

    The world record has many stories and fables surrounding it, like the fact that the instrument blew away, or broke, or things like that. The truth is, it was deiced shortly before the gust hit, and worked well through the storm. The instrument rotated, and made a clicking sound during rotation that was timed to calculate the wind speed. I'm told that during the gust, the clicks were transmitted via radio to Blue Hill to be independantly verified simultaneously, but I'm not sure where I heard that.

    After the event, the instrument was taken down and tested for accuracy...so for the time, it was considered very accurate.

    The winds haven't come close since...

    Part of that is because the observatory moved off of the southeast slope to a new home with a bit more westerly aspect in the 30s, and again in 1980 to a NW facing slope. The eastern face has the greatest funnelling effect on the winds, and the greatest elevation gain. The winds came from the southeast, and the anemometer was the first thing it hit.

    The next highest winds came shortly after the Obs moved to the NW location where it now resides. A gust of 182mph slammed the new building, and observers, who had figured at the time that they would never see another record for the reasons above, were suddenly excited about the new NW winds that they may have been missing...and again...it hasn't happened since.

    The idea of a 100 year storm, or a 500 year storm, or a perfect storm is tossed around the summit to explain this gust a lot. The fact that we haven't seen anything like it makes it the subject of some scrutiny, but when we get complacent, or doubty, we are often proven wrong. I'm sure it will be matched again someday...
    "I've learned that everyone wants to live on top of the mountain, but that all the happiness and growth occurs while you're climbing it."
    ~Andy Rooney

    Follow my photography on Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jim-Sa...y/156147782386

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bellingham, Ma / Dubois Wy.
    Posts
    361
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 40 Times in 19 Posts

    Default

    One of the things I've also heard which may or may not be true is that the number of structures that are on the summit has probably affected the surface speeds. Kind of like the wings of an airplane. If there was nothing on top of Mt Washington except an anemometer then the air would be allowed to flow easier over the top. Having a large building with tall flat sides probably does a real good job of disrupting any laminar flow over the summit.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    2,680
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts

    Default

    Except there were probably more structures around in the 1930s than today.
    Bill
    Next up: Vermont City Marathon: May, 2011
    EasternLight

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bellingham, Ma / Dubois Wy.
    Posts
    361
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked 40 Times in 19 Posts

    Default

    Maybe but then again the shape of the structures might have an impact or the way they're laid out.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas, currently. Moving back north to New England as soon as possible.
    Posts
    82
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by billysinc View Post
    One of the things I've also heard which may or may not be true is that the number of structures that are on the summit has probably affected the surface speeds. Kind of like the wings of an airplane. If there was nothing on top of Mt Washington except an anemometer then the air would be allowed to flow easier over the top. Having a large building with tall flat sides probably does a real good job of disrupting any laminar flow over the summit.
    I agree that structures on the peak would distupt getting accurate data. Why not put the instruments on the peak, and have living and monitoring stations off to the side, or under ground?
    Only one way to go.. Up!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    2,680
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 33 Times in 29 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ColdWeatherClimber View Post
    I agree that structures on the peak would distupt getting accurate data. Why not put the instruments on the peak, and have living and monitoring stations off to the side, or under ground?
    How about getting rid of everything on the summit?

    Actually, the Sherman Adams building is basically built into the mountain and the observatory tower receives unobstructed winds from the majority of the compass. Except of course from the direction where the 231 came from.
    Bill
    Next up: Vermont City Marathon: May, 2011
    EasternLight

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,247
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 398 Times in 250 Posts

    Default

    It is interesting the old tower on Mt Mitchell in NC is being replaced by a built-into-the-mountain structure somewhat like the Sherman Adams building. The old Mt Washington Hotel was a huge building that blocked a lot of wind, especially from the west.
    Brad (a 6288 club member)
    http://bradstreet.zenfolio.com Personal Photo sales site
    http://public.fotki.com/bradbradstreet Personal photo web site
    http://public.fotki.com/MWO/saved/2012/ MWO image & video archive site 2006-2012

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    542
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brad View Post
    It is interesting the old tower on Mt Mitchell in NC is being replaced by a built-into-the-mountain structure somewhat like the Sherman Adams building.
    Really?? We went up to the top in April 2006 looking for snow. Instead we found green grass and adelgid damage. Neat mountains, and the people are so polite. Waffle House off every exit... mmmmm.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,247
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 398 Times in 250 Posts

    Default

    I thought going to Waffle House was only legal after 11PM.

    The summit was closed off when I was there a couple of months ago. But, from the ranger station near the summit you could look up and see the building. I will be getting up there in the spring and will snag some pictures.
    Brad (a 6288 club member)
    http://bradstreet.zenfolio.com Personal Photo sales site
    http://public.fotki.com/bradbradstreet Personal photo web site
    http://public.fotki.com/MWO/saved/2012/ MWO image & video archive site 2006-2012

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •