Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Power Project Destruction

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    2,681
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 34 Times in 30 Posts

    Angry Power Project Destruction

    I'm surprised nobody else has posted about this since the project that brought power to the summit also left a huge scar next to the cog tracks.

    As I originally feared it looks like they have done nothing above treeline to restore the natural look of the terrain they disturbed. They filled the ditch back in, but didn't replace the large rocks or the dirt patches that have been building up over the past 8,000 years or so.

    It looks like a road that somebody could easily drive an ATV up paralleling the cog. Even worse, I saw people hiking up this new "trail." Not sure I blame them either. It's as smooth as a road and takes a direct line to the summit.

    On top of that the state hasn't restored the original entrance to the Sherman-Adams building or removed any of the skeletal foundations left on the summit.
    Bill
    Next up: Vermont City Marathon: May, 2011
    EasternLight

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Bill O For This Useful Post:

    mtruman (07-10-2010)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    1,994
    Thanks
    60
    Thanked 243 Times in 126 Posts

    Default

    Most unfortunate. Any idea who would (should) be responsible for this? Perhaps petitioning for proper repairs is in order. I think we could find many voices to chime in on this.
    Mark

    Keep close to Nature's heart...
    and break clear away, once in awhile,
    and climb a mountain or spend a week in the woods.
    Wash your spirit clean. - John Muir


    Hiking photos: http://picasaweb.google.com/mtruman42
    Hiking Blog: http://theramblingsblog.blogspot.com/
    Seek the 2011 Peak page: Mark Truman's Pledge Page

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    6,247
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 398 Times in 250 Posts

    Default

    One wonders if they need to leave the disturbed area so they can have easier access for maintenance and repairs. Another thought is leaving it this way could be less disruption to the area. Certainly it is cheaper.
    Brad (a 6288 club member)
    http://bradstreet.zenfolio.com Personal Photo sales site
    http://public.fotki.com/bradbradstreet Personal photo web site
    http://public.fotki.com/MWO/saved/2012/ MWO image & video archive site 2006-2012

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    2,681
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 34 Times in 30 Posts

    Default

    I'm not sure what the right answer is. The damage is entirely within the Cog's right of way. They could pave it over or put a slip and slide there if they wanted...but the right thing should be to return the area to some sort of natural state. I just hope they have some sort of plan.
    Bill
    Next up: Vermont City Marathon: May, 2011
    EasternLight

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wahiawa, HI
    Posts
    2,359
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts

    Default

    The slip and slide idea isn't too bad. I was thinking maybe an alpine slide. It could double as a way to get off the mountain in a hurry and if you heat it it can be used in winter for rescues. Just sayin.
    Steve
    Is there really any BAD weather???

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Steve M For This Useful Post:

    Charlie (07-11-2010)

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    185
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 50 Times in 27 Posts

    Default

    I try not to talk out of my hat here in the forum, and since I'm not privy to the entire multiple contract line item details between White Mountain Communications and all the other interested parties ( Cog, State of NH/MWSP, OBS, Auto Road, US Dept of Agriculture, USFS, PSNH) to name SOME... maybe I need to be really really careful with this.

    I'm pretty sure many are familiar with the concept of " alternate or offsetting remediation". When significant road reconstruction occurs on State or Federal highways, sometimes it is unavoidable to do harsh nasty things to wetlands, bogs, streams, river, tundra and alpine areas which would normally be ecologically protected. When contracts are put out to bid, there are usually and often clear terms cited within the contract that call for an offsetting ecological remedy/action.

    With me on that? It is what it is, I'm not saying its right or wrong, it's just how contracts are drawn and how things work.

    The contractor for the Power Project agreed to an alternate/offset remediation. While he could not erase the scar from the power line installation, or return the disturbed area to a totally natural state, he DID agree to remove tons and tons of debris from the Cog Right of Way. Railway debris. Timbers and busted , rusted parts. Years and Years worth of the stuff.

    It's not paying forward in any stretch of the imagination, it is playing catch-up, and I'm not saying the process is inherently right or wrong. Again, it is what it is. Business.

    Breeze

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Southeastern PA
    Posts
    2,065
    Thanks
    744
    Thanked 329 Times in 249 Posts

    Default

    Perhaps Mother Nature will be able to hide some of the scars in a few year's time?
    Bob

    I never want to see a day
    That's over forty degrees
    I'd rather have it thirty,
    Twenty, ten, five and let it freeeeEEEEEEeeze!

    My Seek the Peak 2014 Photo Set

  10. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    2,681
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 34 Times in 30 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snow Miser View Post
    Perhaps Mother Nature will be able to hide some of the scars in a few year's time?
    It will, eventually. If hikers start using it as a trail that will certainly slow the process and could become a real problem if it goes unchecked (I'm not saying it is yet).

    Breeze, thanks for the information. I did actually notice that all that old debris had been removed, that's a great improvement for the mountain. I appreciate the benefits the power projects have brought to the summit and I know the scar will heal. I just know that with a little more work it could be healed even faster.
    Bill
    Next up: Vermont City Marathon: May, 2011
    EasternLight

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    185
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 50 Times in 27 Posts

    Default

    I had an opportunity again this weekend to see and talk to the self-employed contractor for the MW Power Project, and his contracted remediation effort removed 700 tons ( scale weighed, recorded, receipted ) of debris from the Cog Right of Way.

    He was not allowed to use the Auto Road during open hours for oversize vehicles, so all that hauling occurred between 6 PM and 7 AM, he had to have each load weighed to verify HIS bill for gross tonnage use of the Auto Road. HIS bill, as a private contractor for Road Use, not the Cog's bill.

    How green is green and who decides what is a green effort, what green efforts make sense and when is any green effort a fail worthy of shame?

    We've all got a long way to go to have meeting of the minds.

    Breeze

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •